
It seems to me that there is something going on deep in the earth at the boundary of the
Australian and Eurasian continental plates . Over the last 18 months there seems to have been a marked increase in number of significant geological events in the region and it doesn't seem to be slowing down.
While the Boxing Day Tsunami, the Pakistan quake, the rumblings of the Mount Merapi volcano Central Java and now the earthquake in Yogyakarta may seem quite distant from each other, but all of these events do share a common fault line. What's going on down there I wonder?
The truth is there would be nothing I can do about it, even if I knew what was going on. Rumors to the contrary aside, I don't actually have the ability to affect plate tectonics. What also concerned me, and I can have some influence on this, is the effect this planetary instability could have on future nuclear development, and the "debate" here in Australia about the countries role in the provisioning of nuclear fuel.
Quite a leap? Not really. Here are some under reported facts.
The Kartini research reactor research reactor is located at Yogyakarta and while the reactor and its buildings don't seem to have been damaged by the recent quake, some of the outbuildings were.
Last year, the Indonesian Government announced plans to begin building the country's first nuclear power plant in central Java to feed its rapidly growing energy needs. The site for the proposed power plant is next to a dormant volcano called Mount Muria, and is on the fault line that runs through the archipelago.
I am not making any of this up.
Lets face it, there is no such thing as a completely dead volcano, that's why they're called dormant, but if people can live on the slopes of Vesuvius I guess nowhere I out off the question.
It's very true that other countries, notably Japan and the United States have built reactors is geologically unstable areas. The difference is that Indonesia I not as wealthy a country and it has something of a history of, I don't want to say corruption, so let just say cutting corners. Its also doesn't have the best record of environmental concern.
All of this adds up, for me at least, to a recipe for mushroom clouds to the north of the Kimberly's and calls into question the advisability of encouraging the nuclear solution to the burgeoning global power shortage.
It seems to me that the bottom line on nuclear energy is that we just don't know how to deal with waste, waste that is not only incredibly toxic but that remains so for not just decades, but possibly millennia. Today that would be like dealing with a problem that was created by Ethelred the Unready. It's pretty much unthinkable, and yet we seem to be planning to do this to our future generations.
But we seem to be considering it, and all in the name of market forces. The "market" wants to use nuclear energy because its the cheapest solution. The implications here seem to be that a/ cheapest is the same as best and b/ the "market" knows what it is doing.
Can anyone say asbestos?
Companies planning horizons are shrinking so that now the common product planning cycle is only 3 years and it appears government is becoming not much different with politicians only looking as far as the next election or possibly the one after that. At what point did we lose our shared responsibility to future generations.
And I am a big fag. I am never going to have kids. Why should I care about what happens beyond the next 50 or so years? But I do.
What I don't understand is why the rich, fat, old white guys at the top of government and commerce don't care enough about their grandkids to do something to help them. When are our monkey brains going to start seeing further than the end of our own lives? I have to wonder how many disasters we need to live through to start accepting that there are things we can't control and we need to factor this into our calculations.
Playing chicken with mother nature has proven time and again to not be a winning strategy, and yet we still do it. Heres hoping that the Indonesians are lucky a little longer. Long enough that cheap alternates to nuclear energy become available.
Tweet This Post